Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michal Przysiezny vs Daniel Munoz-De La Nava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Przysiezny vs Nava analysis and find out who is favored!
Michal Przysiezny vs Daniel Munoz-De La Nava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Przysiezny 2 - 1 Nava
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Przysiezny has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nava has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Przysiezny, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nava has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Przysiezny has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nava has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Przysiezny has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nava winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Przysiezny has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 156/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 92/ 93). Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 404/ 291), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 15/ 16).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Przysiezny winning 2 times and Nava being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Przysiezny winning 5 and Nava winning 2. The last match between Przysiezny and Nava was at the Wimbledon - London, 19-06-2013, Q3, Grass with Michal Przysiezny getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:24:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Przysiezny and Nava have played a deciding set 0 times, with Przysiezny winning 0 times and Nava 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Przysiezny winning 1, and Nava 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Przysiezny has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nava has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Przysiezny has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nava has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Przysiezny has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nava has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
57
High
40
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
68
High
42
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
56% (465-368)
Career Total W/L
57% (521-389)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$403,630
Career Prize Money
$282,573
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Michal Przysiezny vs Daniel Munoz-De La Nava For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Przysiezny VS Nava
Sportsbook
Offer
Przysiezny VS Nava H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Michal Przysiezny | Daniel Munoz-De La Nava |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
| Games Won | 37 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:24:8 | 0:24:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (35/64) | 65% (31/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (26/35) | 61% (19/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (17/29) | 47% (8/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (21/48) | 33% (21/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Przysiezny VS Nava H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-1 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michal Przysiezny | Daniel Munoz-De La Nava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Michal Przysiezny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michal Przysiezny
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Michal Przysiezny
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Erler
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Michal Przysiezny
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Katayama
Player
Michal Przysiezny
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Jan Choinski
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Sandro Ehrat
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
123)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Inigo Cervantes
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Nys
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
60%
(
32 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Przysiezny Vs Nava Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Przysiezny are available here and Nava photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
